Friday, February 28, 2014

Diigo and Tweets



Hello once again!

The Oscars are only a few days away!  As a tribute to the upcoming awards, I want to introduce you to a handy tool. 

Diigo.com is a website that allows me to search for any tag and find links that relate to that tag.  This leads me a variety of links with several people that “followed” the link.  In the spirit of the Academy Awards a la entertainment, and in the spirit of social media, I searched the words ‘Hollywood’ and ‘Social Media’ to attempt to discover interesting links.

I wasn’t turning up much luck with interesting articles until I began to focus on social media rather than general Hollywood.  The term Hollywood was leading me in circles with no thought-provoking links to dynamic articles.  In fact, they were merely leading me gossip websites or less-than-interesting users with no relevant use.  After clicking next for several pages, I finally found something that could be of use.

I stumbled upon a user’s profile named Eubin Kim. I was first intrigued when I noticed that he had an actual profile written out.  Throughout the several profiles I scanned, only about 5% of the users took the time to write out a profile.  (I am not one of those 5% on Diigo). 

His profile reads:

Interactive art director and video director with more than 10 years experience in campaign concept ideation, visual brand development, user interface design, website design, identity design, video directing / production, and multicultural event marketing and public relations. Expertise in interact...
I use Diigo because To organize things I've read.  Eubin Kim Diigo

The profile description was short, sweet and to the point.  I saw that he claimed he had over 10 years of experience, but what stood out was that he was genuinely using the site to really organize what he had read.  I clicked through his tags and found myself pleasantly surprised.

Eubin’s tags consisted of topics such as social media, digital, facebook, television and branding.  As I was working with television branding this very morning, I continued to read.  His television tag possessed not only articles that discussed topics such as serious digital historical analysis, but it also included speculation on the future of television. 

I then clicked his social tag and discovered a variety of topics within the social media realm.  This includes articles discussing social media as a whole, social media in newsroom and social media with celebrities (Aha!)  This was similar to what I was interested in.  After scanning through the articles, I found one that might seem of some relevance to me.  It was called “Celebrities As Media Critics.”  This article discussed how celebrities were becoming more active in their portrayal in the media.  It served as an enlightening read and I was very glad to have perused through it. 

I found another article titled “Why Most Brand Tweets Fell Flat During the Oscars” which discussed how several brands could not make that connection to their core audience on social media during the 2013 Academy Awards.  Here are some of the tweets that didn't quite make the cut.    






Frankly, these are cringe-worthy but the article brings up the excellent point of how does a social media machine make a legitimate connection to an audience?  What constitutes the success?  These brands clearly miss the mark but how different are brands from Hollywood celebrities? Celebrities themselves are a brand and using social media to sell the product. 


Just something to think about. 


Friday, February 21, 2014

Cards and Oscars

Two items caught my attention this week.  The first being that House of Cards season two has premiered beginning this past Valentine’s Day, and the second being that the Academy Awards are rapidly approaching. 



This past week I’ve divided my time between doing work and watching the new season of House of Cards.  I was drawn to the television series last December when a friend of mine continually posted about it on Twitter.  Since it’s inception, I had heard nothing but praises for the original Netflix show. 

I had to check it out.

Four fifty-minute episodes later I struggled to keep my eyes open as the next episode began to load.  It was thrilling.  I get it.  I get why all of my friends were raving about this show. 

So how does this happen?

How are people drawn into binge-watching shows so easily?

Hell, I’m even watching the show while writing this post.  It must be the access and the quality of the show.  House of Cards pulls the viewers in and doesn’t pull back the punches.  A shocking action in its season two premiere left me wondering if the entire scene was actually dream sequence.

It was not.

But getting back to the original question: Why has binge-watching gotten so popular?  This would be worth investigating as it has become socially acceptable to sit and stare at the computer screen to watch dozens of new episodes. 

According to Varity.com “Approximately 2% of Netflix subscribers on U.S. broadband networks took the weekend to polish off all 13 [House of Cards] episodes.”  Variety Source This accounts for approximately 634,000 individuals.  All 634,000 of these people watched over thirteen hours of television in a weekend time frame. 

I’m not even necessarily surprised, if anything, I’m impressed. Frankly, I should put more effort into binge-watching the films that were nominated for Academy Awards rather than watching television shows. 

Speaking of the Academy Awards, I hear that the traditional gift bags are being filled with $80,000 worth of items this year.  For those who are unaware, the Academy traditionally gifts the losing nominations during the Oscars.  Despite their loss, the individuals are graced with parting gifts as a token of well-wishing and ‘Better Luck Next Time.’

“It’s an honor to be nominated” certainly takes another meaning doesn’t it?  I wouldn’t be so disheartened if I knew I was receiving a consolation prize. 

According to Newsday this year’s swag bags include: “Hydroxycut Gummies, Swiss-made Slow watches, Vetvik luxury leather iPhone cases, Le Petit Cirque aerial lessons, a Steamist Total Sense Spa System, Epic Pet Health electrolyte therapy, Max Martin shoes and vacation packages to either the Canadian Rockies, Hawaii, Mexico or Japan” amongst other prizes.

I’m not sure what half of those items are.  But honestly, some of them sound like made-up things.  Epic Pet Health electrolyte therapy?  Really?  A majority of people know that this money could be spent elsewhere.  There must be charities or good causes that might benefit from such a generous donation.  Celebrities are the last people who are in desperate need of free gifts. 

Yet, in the meantime I will laugh because items such as Horse shampoo for humans are included in as a gift with no explanation as to why it’s there. 


It’s absolutely hysterical.  For a more detailed look at a few of the items here is the US Magazine article: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-style/news/oscars-2014-celebrity-swag-bags-losing-nominees-gift-products-2014202





Monday, February 17, 2014

Netvibes

Hello,

I’ve recently created a Netvibes account, which allows me to essentially filter through entertainment blogs and news sites.  It’s fantastic because it gives me the opportunity to look at the top stories of the day in one location.

I would normally have to travel from individual site to individual site.  While clicking through all of these websites doesn’t necessarily add a substantial amount of time to my daily morning internet browsing, but it gives me a cheat sheet for daily headlines.

There are reasons why I have these specific websites linked to the page.  I added several blogs that I stumbled across so that I can receive the most up to date posts.  But I am especially happy to have news in one location.

I generally like to have a mixture of sources.  As an individual who is located in the mix of the entertainment industry I like to see what is occurring in Los Angeles.  Placing the Los Angeles Times and news sites such as CNN into this netvibe dashboard gives me the opportunity to take a look at all aspects of the entertainment industry. I like to know what entertainment news is making the global rounds.   I have general news sites, entertainment blogs, and entertainment news sites here.

Deadline is an absolute favorite of mine.  This news site is formatted like a blog but it gives the most up-to-date information and news about the entertainment industry.  Because it extensively covers the business element within the entertainment industry, I have to hop onto another website if I want to specifically read about celebrity antics.


It’s interesting because in this one place and I can stumble across the film review articles such as “The Monuments Men can be lengthy but provides historical value” and “Making the most of the Mediocrity of Monuments Men.”  The two headlines caught my eyes and I quickly opened both tabs to read about the seemingly differing opinions.

As a World War II history buff and film student this film was already on my radar.  I’ve been meaning to read the book that it was based off of.   But I have no love lost for George Clooney despite Hollywood’s love for him. 

Because there are seemingly opposing titles and viewpoints, I’m suddenly interested in what they have to say about Monuments Men.  I’ve had my eye on the project since it’s announcement.  I was originally dissuaded by the aging cast and the attempt convince the audience that they indeed were able soldiers ready to be sent to the front to reclaim priceless and historical works of art.   Cate Blanchett and Jean Dujardin were stand-out figures that reeled my curiosity back in.

Without spotting the conflicting headings I would have happily gone on to attempt to watch the film by the time it was released on DVD.  But now that I’ve read about it, I might make the attempt to view it in theatres (after all it’s been a while since a history-based film has been released.)  I feel like numerous amounts of sequels or remakes have been hitting theaters in the past year.  It will be nice to view a historical-based film for a change.




Friday, January 31, 2014

Revoking Nominations

I’m absolutely terrible at keeping up with Oscar-nominated films.  Of the ten nominations I’ve only seen one film.  The hilarious part is that I’m a film major so this is particularly embarrassing. 

While there are ways to view the films, I for some reason don’t make the effort to go see them.  It’s terrible.  I haven’t made the effort to visit the popular industry biz website Deadline.com either since my internship last semester.  God knows that I scrounged through that site about three times a day to keep up with what was going on.  It was always exciting to see my studio mentioned because I felt like I was a part of something that's being recognized by the entertainment industry.

I should also actively keep up with Oscar related news because then I’ll stumble into juicy gossip like this:


This morning as I was reading the newspaper, a small blurb in the LATExtra section of the Los Angeles Times caught my eyes.  The article discussed how a nomination for Best Original Song was rescinded by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.  I was genuinely shocked that a nomination would be taken out of the ballot a little over a month before the Academy Awards.

My first thought was that they must have done something illegal when campaigning for votes.  Bribing people would certainly warrant such a severe punishment.  (Although Hollywood isn't exactly known for its impeccable morals).

This was not the case:
The veteran composer emailed about a fifth of the other 239 members of the music branch, asking them to "please consider the song." - Los Angeles Times (Source)
The composer of the song "Alone Yet Not Alone" Bruce Broughton is an executive on the Academy committee and he held the position as governor in the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.  According to the Academy, this is the first time the Academy has disqualified someone for improper campaigning practices.  In the past, films have been rescinded for technicalities over eligibility requirements.  One of which include the debate if a foreign film was produced in the actual country that it represented in the Best Foreign Film category.  

In my opinion, there are instances which should have deserved more repercussions if the Academy actually punishes films for "improper campaigning."  During the voting period for the 2010 82nd Academy Awards, a producer named Nicolas Chartier for The Hurt Locker emailed a list of Academy members.
He asked them to vote for The Hurt Locker, rather than a "$500 million film [referencing the film Avatar], we need independent movies to win like the movies you and I do."- Indiewire (Source)
In response, the Academy revoked Chartier's Oscar tickets so that he was unable to attend the ceremony.  He was eventually handed his Oscar statuette for The Hurt Locker's win over Cameron's mammoth film Avatar.  But this blatant plea for votes seems to be more belligerent than asking for someone to "consider the song."

While I'm sure people have different opinions about the debacle, this is my own personal response to the unusual punishment.  It's too bad that a small film lost out on a chance for publicity and potential accolade.  The nomination list remains with these songs:

  • "Happy" - Despicable Me 2: Music and Lyrics by Pharrell Williams
  • "Let It Go" - Frozen: Music and Lyrics by Kristen Anderson-Lopez and Robert Lopez
  • "The Moon Song" - Her:  Music by Karen O (Karen Lee Orzolek) • Lyrics by Karen O and Spike Jonze
  • "Ordinary Love" - Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom: Music by Paul Hewson, Dave Evans, Larry Mullen and Adam Clayton (U2) • Lyrics by Paul Hewson (Bono)

I would love for "Let it Go" to win, but "Ordinary Love" is a sure bet.  The Academy absolutely loves U2.  

In the meantime, I will attempt to get through as many Best Picture nominations as possible before the March 2nd Academy Awards.  Don't forget to tune in!